We have something “tag”
But now let’s imagine about different term, “tag group”
It’s like a title link but it’s different from it
What makes the difference is when “tag group” created (let’s say named X in the study of A), all tagged noded from multiple studies (B,C…) with X, going as a CHILD AUTOMATICALLY (without copy\paste process) under X in the study of A.
-the user won’t need to copy paste nodes (or captures) from all studies for selective tag name.
-it will save the time and most importantly WILLPOWER
-it will give the courage users for creating tags more (because when tag group created the users know that when he tag something from any study, it goes directly as a child node under specific group of specific study.)
Why I need this for example:
I got SAME tag name from DIFFERENT studies. I want to combine them for screen but most importantly after creating one tag group, whenever I WISH to tag a node under this specific tag name: I WANT TO FEEL, this node goes ALSO under the tag group as a CHILD NODE, without my any effort .
Another explanation for this NEED:
Because so many times (the scenario), let’s say I am reading something, I faced something beautiful and I wish to tag it. But I want ALSO keep reading it with the NEED of feeling this node should be also under the another study.
But this is the crossroad for users who
-wants to keep reading without thinking and
-wants to copy and paste that beautiful node to another study and come back study again for keep reading (this is the BIG WASTER OF WILLPOWER)
and that is WHY the users need “tag group “
there are so many tag users in this platform, I m sure they feel the same for that specific NEED.
By the way there are old another wishes stays still unsolved…(just for remembering ):